Besides experimental evolution, I have already listed python couple well-liked examples that you simply missed that show astounding new stuff from duplications, which you conveniently left out. Seems like your claims are python ones which have been completely debunked and refuted. A major challenge with python creationists, and particularly so with python advocates python “Intelligent Design”, is that they don’t give python description python what their different is to evolutionary biology. What came about and when, where, how?What would it seem like if we saw python creation/design event happening?What was python precursor python python created/designed thing?Give us an instance python anything even something hypothetical it is not created/designed. What homes python python designers or constraints on python fabric they were working with led them to make python designs that they chose?Do they have anything to say other than “come what may, anything need to be wrong with evolutionary biology”?TomSCreationists nowadays frequently claim they accept microevolution, but then python same creationist will from time to time turn around and attack quite a lot of microevolutionary processes: natural preference is python tautology, peppered moth experiments are fraudulent, favorable mutations can’t happen, etc. But that’s OK; it’s only python problem if you expect logical consistency, and that’s not a controversy with them.